Search
Close this search box.

China’s Crumbling Economy is Collapsing! Real Reason China’s World Domination Plan Failed

Xi Jinping is a Chinese politician who has been serving as the general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and chairman of the Central Military Commission, and thus as the paramount leader of China, since 2012. Xi has also served as the president of the People's Republic of China since 2013.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative Analysis

Overview

  • China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is facing significant setbacks, with multiple countries, including the Philippines and Italy, deciding to exit the project.
  • Italy’s withdrawal, a G7 member, is considered a critical blow to CCP’s (Chinese Communist Party) global ambitions.

Reasons for Italy’s Participation

  • Italy joined BRI in 2019, driven by economic ties with China dating back to the 1980s.
  • Historical economic relationships and trade missions fueled Italy’s interest in joining BRI.
  • The prospect of increased economic activity, as observed in other countries partnering with China, was a motivating factor.

Sinister Motives Behind BRI

  • Many countries, including Italy, began realizing CCP’s sinister motives behind BRI.
  • CCP’s aggressive lending strategy involved gaining control over strategic resources and locations in debtor nations.
  • China’s lack of concern for the economic viability of projects and influence over corrupt politicians raised global concerns.

CCP’s Loan Strategy

  • China’s lending strategy involved offering loans to struggling nations, gaining control over resources when countries defaulted.
  • Aggressive interest rates and short payback periods led to high failure rates on these loans.
  • CCP’s economic influence was wielded to ensure politicians aligned with China’s agenda.

Examples of BRI Failures

  • Examples like the Hambantota port in Sri Lanka and various projects in Africa showcased BRI’s malinvestments and lack of oversight.
  • Loans often resulted in nonproductive infrastructure and economic burdens on debtor nations.

Economic Blackmail and Bullying

  • CCP engaged in economic blackmail, as seen in Lithuania, to enforce political alignment with its agenda.
  • China’s refusal to negotiate debt restructuring with other creditors increased difficulties for struggling countries.

Western Initiatives in Response

  • Western powers, including the US, EU, and India, initiated counterprograms like the International Development Finance Corporation, the Partnership for Global Infrastructure Investment, and India’s investment fund.
  • These initiatives aim to provide alternative financing with a focus on sustainability, transparency, gender equality, and climate change.

Global Impact

  • Currently, 15% of countries are in financial distress, and half are at high risk due to aggressive Chinese lending.
  • The global community is actively countering CCP’s economic influence with alternative initiatives.

In summary, China’s Belt and Road Initiative faces challenges due to its aggressive lending practices, lack of oversight, and geopolitical consequences. Debtor nations are increasingly cautious, and global powers are responding with alternative programs to address infrastructure needs while prioritizing ethical considerations.

  • Build Back Better World (B3W):
    • B3W initially launched but faced challenges and was later renamed.
    • The US initiated a new project in 2022 with G7 allies, named Program for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PG2).
    • Aims to mobilize $200 billion by 2027, with a total of $600 billion with G7 partners.
    • Emphasis on private sector funding rather than direct G7 contribution.
  • US Investment in Africa:
    • Recognizes Africa’s importance and invests in infrastructure through PG2.
    • Prosper Africa initiative aims to enhance mutual trade relations.
    • Connects US businesses to African markets, fostering private sector involvement.
    • Example: A Texas company secured a contract with the government of Ghana through the initiative.
  • Global Players in African Investment:
    • Besides the US and China, other players include the EU, India, UAE, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and the UK.
  • European Union’s Response – Global Gateway:
    • Responds to China’s Belt and Road Initiative with the Global Gateway Investment Package.
    • Aims to mobilize up to €300 billion by 2027, with €150 billion allocated for African countries.
    • Criticized for being smaller and having different goals focused on sustainability, healthcare, and education.
  • Comparison with China’s Approach:
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) criticized for some failed projects due to poor planning and execution.
    • EU focuses on smaller and more sustainable projects, potentially offering benefits in the long term.
  • Challenges for the EU:
    • EU’s bureaucratic nature and political differences among member states hinder quick execution.
    • Limited capital compared to China.
  • India’s Response to China’s Expansion:
    • India counters China’s Belt and Road with strategic alliances, forming a “necklace of diamonds.”
    • Expands naval bases, improves relations with strategically placed countries.
    • Invests in policies to enhance relationships with Japan and Vietnam.
    • Provides credit lines to neighboring countries to counter Chinese loans.
  • India’s Economic Initiatives:
    • Lends money to neighboring countries to avoid dependence on Chinese loans.
    • Extends credit lines to Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Maldives.
    • Rapid expansion of Indian companies in the region to counter Chinese influence.
  • India’s Partnerships:
    • Forms the India Middle East Europe Economic Corridor (IMC) with the US, EU, and Saudi Arabia.
    • IMC includes railway, hydrogen pipeline, and optical fiber cables to enhance connectivity.
    • Quad alliance with the US, Japan, and Australia focused on security and various key issues.
  • Quad’s Objectives:
    • Addresses issues beyond security, including vaccines, infrastructure, climate change, technology, and humanitarian assistance.
    • Conducts military exercises for interoperability and emergency response.

This analysis captures the key information regarding international infrastructure initiatives, focusing on the US, China, the EU, and India, along with their strategies, challenges, and partnerships.

more insights